Six claims, checked
The claims, checked against the sourcing
“It cost about $200 to make”
Unverified / likely wrong
This figure spread through several English entertainment sites, usually alongside “most profitable
film ever made.” We could not find a Chinese source that supports it. What Chinese reporting actually
says: the production company, Dalian Jingyuan Culture Film and Television Media, has roughly
¥100,000 (~US$14,000) in registered capital, and the film took about five years to
make. That's a low budget by any industry standard — but it's a different order of magnitude from
$200, and registered capital isn't the same thing as production spend anyway. The $200 figure looks
like a compressed, unsourced number that spread because it made a better headline.
“It's the most profitable movie ever made”
Unsupported
No official financial disclosure supports this. It's a natural companion claim to the “$200
budget” figure above — if you accept an artificially low cost, almost any box office looks like an
absurd return. Niu Lai's return on investment is genuinely remarkable by industry standards; “most
profitable film ever” is marketing language, not an audited fact.
“It's AI-generated”
False
Two people — director Xin Yumeng and his mother, writer/composer Sun Lifang — made it by hand over
roughly five years, using second-hand equipment and SketchUp, an architectural modelling tool, rather
than an animation suite or any generative AI. Its rough look is the signature of amateur technique and
a tiny budget, which is exactly why English-language coverage seized on it as an “anti-AI” symbol —
see why that narrative took hold.
Box office figures vary wildly between sources
Explained, not contradictory
You'll see anything from ¥24 million to ¥41 million quoted as “the” box office total. Both can be
right: Chinese and English outlets pull from different real-time tracking platforms (Maoyan Pro,
Beacon/灯塔) at different snapshot times during a run that moved by millions of yuan per day. This is
normal for a fast-moving release, not evidence anyone is lying. See our
dated breakdown →
“It was made as a joke / a deliberate troll”
False
Nothing in the reporting on Xin Yumeng and Sun Lifang suggests they set out to make something
intentionally bad. It reads as a sincere five-year passion project by two people without professional
training, released with an almost total absence of marketing. The internet's reaction — not the
film's intent — is where the comedy comes from.
“Niu Lai” caused a real stock market move
True, but not fundamentally connected
This one checks out, and most English coverage misses it entirely. “牛来” (Niu Lai) is a
near-homophone for “牛市来” — “the bull market is coming.” Some Chinese retail investors bought movie
tickets as a superstitious good-luck ritual, and stocks containing the character 牛 (bull/cow) briefly
spiked — Luoniu Mountain hit its daily limit, Jintniu Chemical rose over 8%, Tongniu Information rose
nearly 4%. None of those companies has any actual business connection to the film; this was pure
pun-driven trading sentiment, a recognised pattern in Chinese retail markets.